Website Project Evaluation Criteria
This document outlines the comprehensive evaluation criteria for student website projects at lundsh University of Kyrgyzstan, designed to assess technical implementation, design quality, and content excellence.
Overview
The evaluation system uses a comprehensive scoring approach with weighted categories to ensure fair and thorough assessment of student work. Each project is evaluated across five main dimensions:
| Evaluation Category |
Weight |
Max Score |
Description |
| Technical Implementation |
30% |
30 points |
HTML, CSS, JavaScript quality and standards compliance |
| Interface Design |
25% |
25 points |
Visual design, user experience, and accessibility |
| Content Quality |
25% |
25 points |
Content relevance, accuracy, and presentation |
| Innovation & Creativity |
10% |
10 points |
Original ideas, creative solutions, and unique features |
| Project Completion |
10% |
10 points |
Functionality completeness and attention to detail |
|
Technical Implementation (30 points)
HTML Structure (10 points):
- Semantic HTML5 elements usage
- Proper document structure and hierarchy
- Valid markup and accessibility considerations
- Clean and organized code structure
CSS Styling (10 points):
- External stylesheet organization
- Responsive design implementation
- Cross-browser compatibility
- Code efficiency and maintainability
JavaScript Functionality (10 points):
- Interactive features implementation
- Error handling and code reliability
- Performance optimization
- Modern JavaScript practices
|
Interface Design (25 points)
Visual Design (10 points):
- Color scheme and typography choices
- Layout balance and composition
- Consistent visual hierarchy
- Professional appearance and aesthetics
User Experience (10 points):
- Intuitive navigation design
- Clear information architecture
- User-friendly interaction patterns
- Loading performance and responsiveness
Accessibility (5 points):
- Mobile device compatibility
- Screen reader accessibility
- Keyboard navigation support
- Inclusive design principles
|
Content Quality (25 points)
Content Relevance (10 points):
- Alignment with project objectives
- Target audience appropriateness
- Information accuracy and reliability
- Content depth and comprehensiveness
Writing Quality (8 points):
- Clear and engaging writing style
- Proper grammar and spelling
- Logical content organization
- Appropriate tone and voice
Media Integration (7 points):
- Effective use of images and graphics
- Multimedia content optimization
- Copyright compliance
- Visual content enhancement
|
Innovation & Creativity (10 points)
- Original design concepts and ideas
- Creative problem-solving approaches
- Unique feature implementation
- Innovation in user interaction
- Creative use of technology
|
Project Completion (10 points)
- All planned features implemented
- Thorough testing and bug fixes
- Complete documentation provided
- Attention to detail in final presentation
- Meeting project deadlines
|
Grading Scale
| Score Range |
Grade |
Rating |
Performance Level |
| 90-100 |
A |
★★★★★ |
Excellent - Exceptional work exceeding expectations |
| 80-89 |
B |
★★★★☆ |
Good - Solid work meeting all requirements |
| 70-79 |
C |
★★★☆☆ |
Satisfactory - Acceptable work with room for improvement |
| 60-69 |
D |
★★☆☆☆ |
Needs Improvement - Basic requirements partially met |
| Below 60 |
F |
★☆☆☆☆ |
Unsatisfactory - Significant revision required |
|
Evaluation Process
Submission Requirements:
- Complete website files in organized folder structure
- Project documentation including design rationale
- Testing evidence and bug fix documentation
- Reflection essay on learning experience
Review Process:
- Initial technical review and functionality testing
- Design and user experience assessment
- Content quality and accuracy verification
- Innovation and creativity evaluation
- Final scoring and detailed feedback preparation
Feedback Delivery:
- Detailed evaluation report with specific scores
- Constructive feedback for improvement
- Recognition of strengths and achievements
- Suggestions for future project development
|
|